<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Motorcycle tryout: Suzuki SV650N K4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.helmethairblog.com/motorcycle-tryout-suzuki-sv650n-k4/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.helmethairblog.com/motorcycle-tryout-suzuki-sv650n-k4</link>
	<description>All about motorcycles and motorcycle riding. Out of the ordinary bike reviews, videos, photos, and great stories.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:41:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedro</title>
		<link>http://www.helmethairblog.com/motorcycle-tryout-suzuki-sv650n-k4/comment-page-1#comment-261506</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 15:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.helmethairblog.com/motorcycle-tryout-suzuki-sv650n-k4/#comment-261506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did not like the journey, though I was sitting behind my friend. What to say? looks gorgeous but not rider&#039;s friend :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did not like the journey, though I was sitting behind my friend. What to say? looks gorgeous but not rider&#8217;s friend <img src='http://www.helmethairblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzuki Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.helmethairblog.com/motorcycle-tryout-suzuki-sv650n-k4/comment-page-1#comment-161678</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzuki Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 11:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.helmethairblog.com/motorcycle-tryout-suzuki-sv650n-k4/#comment-161678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You 10000% would need a fairing in motor way travel.  A lot of people think this bike is for the newbies of the motorbike world, but looks can be deceiving.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You 10000% would need a fairing in motor way travel.  A lot of people think this bike is for the newbies of the motorbike world, but looks can be deceiving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skelly</title>
		<link>http://www.helmethairblog.com/motorcycle-tryout-suzuki-sv650n-k4/comment-page-1#comment-91226</link>
		<dc:creator>skelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 00:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.helmethairblog.com/motorcycle-tryout-suzuki-sv650n-k4/#comment-91226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve had a K7 SV650S for the last 7 or 8 months and it&#039;s an absolute hoot. I can&#039;t agree with Dave&#039;s comments on the looks, as this is only a personal preference, but I do 60 miles a day at motorway speeds, and any bike without a fairing (of some description) would make the ride almost unbearable. I&#039;ve found that the brakes could do with more power and the forks dive, but that&#039;s because I&#039;m riding it harder than I should. The engine is lovely, and although it won&#039;t break the land speed record, I&#039;ve had mine up to 145mph on a track. It&#039;s a slim bike, thanks to the fact that it&#039;s a v-twin and is really easy to ride. Don&#039;t be fooled that this is a bike only for beginners. I&#039;ve been riding for 25 years and I love it. It&#039;s not the UK&#039;s best selling street bike for no reason.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had a K7 SV650S for the last 7 or 8 months and it&#8217;s an absolute hoot. I can&#8217;t agree with Dave&#8217;s comments on the looks, as this is only a personal preference, but I do 60 miles a day at motorway speeds, and any bike without a fairing (of some description) would make the ride almost unbearable. I&#8217;ve found that the brakes could do with more power and the forks dive, but that&#8217;s because I&#8217;m riding it harder than I should. The engine is lovely, and although it won&#8217;t break the land speed record, I&#8217;ve had mine up to 145mph on a track. It&#8217;s a slim bike, thanks to the fact that it&#8217;s a v-twin and is really easy to ride. Don&#8217;t be fooled that this is a bike only for beginners. I&#8217;ve been riding for 25 years and I love it. It&#8217;s not the UK&#8217;s best selling street bike for no reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://www.helmethairblog.com/motorcycle-tryout-suzuki-sv650n-k4/comment-page-1#comment-73364</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.helmethairblog.com/motorcycle-tryout-suzuki-sv650n-k4/#comment-73364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hi, thanks for your comments - I&#039;m currently riding a suzuki bandit 250. Its great, but you have to &#039;wring its neck&#039; to get decent performance. I am looking to upgrade to a sv650n. I like the idea that they have plenty of low and mid range power and DO NOT do 260 km/hr, i want to keep my licence!! cheers jason]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi, thanks for your comments &#8211; I&#8217;m currently riding a suzuki bandit 250. Its great, but you have to &#8216;wring its neck&#8217; to get decent performance. I am looking to upgrade to a sv650n. I like the idea that they have plenty of low and mid range power and DO NOT do 260 km/hr, i want to keep my licence!! cheers jason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.helmethairblog.com/motorcycle-tryout-suzuki-sv650n-k4/comment-page-1#comment-9250</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.helmethairblog.com/motorcycle-tryout-suzuki-sv650n-k4/#comment-9250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had a 2001 SV650s. The S version is O.K. if you get a taller windscreen from Zero gravity. The engine vibrates far less than a 919 and has adequate power. The brakes are marginal being two piston and requiring quite a bit of hand pressure, but they work O.K..
 The naked version has lower pegs and of course the higher bars. The S version is pretty uncomfortable to ride very far. Probably the naked version with a decent fairing installed could provide a better and more attractive motorcycle than the S version I had with the ugly fairing with weird and not so good lights. The 919 light is better than an older SV650S&#039; lights.
 Probably perfomance-wise there&#039;s not much difference between a 919 and an SV650. The SV sounds better. The 919 at first reminded me of riding a sewing machine after the SV. The SV S had no ground-clearence problems, unlike the 919 which does to a degree, but that&#039;s the comprimise between sportiness and comfort. The steering input of the 919 is better than what I would call nebulous, regarding the SV&#039;s feeling on the road.
 V twins lock up the rear wheel easier than fours when downshifting I&#039;ve noticed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a 2001 SV650s. The S version is O.K. if you get a taller windscreen from Zero gravity. The engine vibrates far less than a 919 and has adequate power. The brakes are marginal being two piston and requiring quite a bit of hand pressure, but they work O.K..<br />
 The naked version has lower pegs and of course the higher bars. The S version is pretty uncomfortable to ride very far. Probably the naked version with a decent fairing installed could provide a better and more attractive motorcycle than the S version I had with the ugly fairing with weird and not so good lights. The 919 light is better than an older SV650S&#8217; lights.<br />
 Probably perfomance-wise there&#8217;s not much difference between a 919 and an SV650. The SV sounds better. The 919 at first reminded me of riding a sewing machine after the SV. The SV S had no ground-clearence problems, unlike the 919 which does to a degree, but that&#8217;s the comprimise between sportiness and comfort. The steering input of the 919 is better than what I would call nebulous, regarding the SV&#8217;s feeling on the road.<br />
 V twins lock up the rear wheel easier than fours when downshifting I&#8217;ve noticed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
